RTT’s toolkit builds the skill sets and mindsets that enable leaders, institutions, and communities to manifest pluralism-in-action.
Seasoned mediators and conflict resolution experts describe RTT’s training as “best-in-class” and the most effective they have experienced in decades of work. Our framework empowers leaders with tools to overcome patterns of destructive conflict— including confirmation bias, animosity, and avoidance—and to disseminate these tools in their own institutions and contexts. Our intensive training and hands-on coaching are unparalleled in the bridge-building field.
Driven by research on how tipping point change occurs, we scale by training norm-shapers— individuals with social capital who are trusted within their regions, sectors, or institutions and influence how others think and behave. Norm-shapers include faith leaders and administrators in higher education as well as TV writers and journalists. Longitudinal research shows that our programs create downstream impacts for years to come in the communities and networks of those we train.
Our methodology enables us to build trust and overcome suspicion of dialogue work itself. We successfully draw to the table rural, working class, progressive activist, and religious conservative people whose communities and voices tend to be rare in bridge-building efforts. We enable even adversarial parties to achieve trust and breakthroughs more quickly and robustly than they believed possible.
We enable participants to engage the thorny issues that matter most to them directly. Unlike many bridge-building efforts, we do not steer participants toward common ground. Our work is premised on the insight that opposing parties often reach greater trust, collaboration, connection, and even basic rehumanization when they’ve investigated their differences openly and come out the other side.
Our team of experts draw from decades of experience in mediation, conflict transformation, trauma therapy, and social research. We have innovated an extensive toolkit supporting parties entering the room with suspicion, trepidation, and distrust to achieve mutual recognition while addressing their differences head-on.
Seasoned mediators and conflict resolution experts describe RTT’s training as “best-in-class” and the most effective they have experienced in decades of work. Our framework empowers leaders with tools to overcome patterns of destructive conflict—including confirmation bias, animosity, and avoidance—and to disseminate these tools in their own institutions and contexts. Our intensive training and hands-on coaching are unparalleled in the bridge-building field.
Driven by research on how tipping point change occurs, we scale by training norm-shapers—individuals with social capital who are trusted within their regions, sectors, or institutions and influence how others think and behave. Norm-shapers include faith leaders and administrators in higher education as well as TV writers and journalists. Longitudinal research shows that our programs create downstream impacts for years to come in the communities and networks of those we train.
Our methodology enables us to build trust and overcome suspicion of dialogue work itself. We successfully draw to the table rural, working class, progressive activist, and religious conservative people whose communities and voices tend to be rare in bridge-building efforts. We enable even adversarial parties to achieve trust and breakthroughs more quickly and robustly than they believed possible.
We enable participants to engage the thorny issues that matter most to them directly. Unlike many bridge-building efforts, we do not steer participants toward common ground. Our work is premised on the insight that opposing parties often reach greater trust, collaboration, connection, and even basic rehumanization when they’ve investigated their differences openly and come out the other side.
Our team of experts draw from decades of experience in mediation, conflict transformation, trauma therapy, and social research. We have innovated an extensive toolkit supporting parties entering the room with suspicion, trepidation, and distrust to achieve mutual recognition while addressing their differences head-on.
Resetting the Table’s framework has been refined over decades of innovation, research, and application. Our interventions are designed to overcome patterns of destructive conflict and build generative discussion and problem-solving in their place.
Conflict produces three broad tendencies: self-absorption, rigidity, and reactivity. At a societal level, toxic conflict produces echo chambers, perception gaps, motive attribution asymmetry, exaggerated perception of threat, and attack-defend cycles that become hard to reverse.
The heart of our methodology at RTT is a series of interventions and practical tools designed to shift parties from toxic to constructive conflict.
Self-absorbed
Rigid
Reactive
Recognition
Receptivity
Centeredness
1This framework is most influenced by the theoretical and practical insights of Transformative Mediation. Transformative Mediation observes that often parties turn to mediators less to broker deals or find shared interests than to get out of the painful and destabilizing experience of being in conflict, and restore their own capacities to relate and communicate well.
We train facilitators and design our processes to produce these shifts proactively and restore them when they’re undermined.
We create the conditions to shift rigidity into receptivity, even in the face of animosity, distrust, and fear.
We tackle contentious issues directly, knowing doing so makes bridge-building more durable, effective, and likely to reach the people who most need to be reached.
Our methodology enables us to build trust and overcome suspicion of dialogue work itself. We successfully draw to the table rural, working class, progressive activist, and religious conservative people whose communities and voices tend to be rare in bridge-building efforts. We enable even adversarial parties to achieve trust and breakthroughs more quickly and robustly than they believed possible.
We train facilitators and design our processes to produce these shifts proactively and restore them when they’re undermined.
We create the conditions to shift rigidity into receptivity, even in the face of animosity, distrust, and fear.
We tackle contentious issues directly, knowing doing so makes bridge-building more durable, effective, and likely to reach the people who most need to be reached.
Our methodology enables us to build trust and overcome suspicion of dialogue work itself. We successfully draw to the table rural, working class, progressive activist, and religious conservative people whose communities and voices tend to be rare in bridge-building efforts. We enable even adversarial parties to achieve trust and breakthroughs more quickly and robustly than they believed possible.